top of page

While these cases may not all relate to the activities of First Amendment auditors, it's important to understand and appreciate the landmark decisions that have affirmed the press's liberty to inform, investigate, and scrutinize. The courts have robustly defended press freedom against government overreach while recognizing individual protections against unfounded media practices. Importantly, while the press is not entirely immune from lawsuits, the courts have prohibited prior restraint, ensuring that government cannot block publication of news stories except under extreme circumstances.

Freedom of Press


Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (1982): The First Amendment does not exempt newspapers from general laws, allowing a source to sue for damages when a promise of confidentiality is breached​​.

Chandler v. Florida (1981): States are allowed to have cameras in courtrooms, as it does not inherently violate a defendant's rights​​.


Gertz vs. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974): Private individuals do not have to prove actual malice to win defamation cases if the statement involves a matter of public concern​​.

Curtis Publishing v. Butts (1966): The actual malice standard for defamation extends to public figures, not just public officials​​.


Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart (1976): Restraining the press from reporting on trial proceedings violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments​​.


Branzburg v. Hayes (1971): Reporters do not have a First Amendment privilege to refuse to reveal sources to grand juries unless certain conditions are met​​.


New York Times Co. vs. United States (1971): The government cannot exercise prior restraint to prevent newspapers from publishing classified information unless it can prove direct and immediate harm to the nation​​.


New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964): Public officials must prove actual malice to win a defamation lawsuit, significantly protecting freedom of the press​​.

Near v. Minnesota (1931): Government injunctions to prevent publication are unconstitutional prior restraints, except in rare cases​.


Q. What is the role of a First Amendment auditor in relation to freedom of the press?

A: First Amendment auditors often consider themselves citizen journalists, exercising their freedom of the press to document and disseminate information about public officials' activities.


Q. Can anyone be considered a member of the press under the First Amendment?

A: Yes, the First Amendment protection of freedom of the press applies broadly, not just to traditional journalists but also to individuals gathering and disseminating news and information.


Q. Do First Amendment auditors have the same rights as traditional journalists?

A: Generally, yes. The law does not typically distinguish between traditional journalists and others who are gathering information to disseminate to the public.


Q. Are there any special credentials needed to assert freedom of the press as an auditor?

A: No, there are no mandatory credentials required to assert one's rights under freedom of the press.


Q. Can First Amendment auditors record public officials during their official duties?

A: Yes, recording public officials in public spaces while they are performing their duties is generally protected by the First Amendment.


Q. How do privacy laws affect First Amendment auditors acting as members of the press?

A: Auditors must be mindful of privacy laws, which restrict recording in places where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy.


Q. What should an auditor do if they are prohibited from recording at a public event?

A: Auditors should assess the situation to determine if the prohibition is a valid time, place, and manner restriction. If unsure, they may choose to comply and seek legal advice later.


Q. Can government agencies create policies that restrict recording by First Amendment auditors?

A: Yes, but such policies must be content-neutral, narrowly tailored, and leave open ample alternative channels for communication.


Q. Do First Amendment auditors have a right to attend and record closed government meetings?

A: No, the right to record does not extend to meetings that are lawfully closed to the public.


Q. Are there any restrictions on publishing recordings made by First Amendment auditors?

A: While the right to publish is broadly protected, auditors cannot publish illegally obtained recordings or those that violate legitimate privacy interests.


Q. Can First Amendment auditors face legal repercussions for their recordings?

A: Yes, if auditors violate laws related to trespassing, privacy, or other applicable statutes, they can face legal repercussions.


Q. Is it legal for public officials to demand that an auditor stop recording in public?

A: Unless there is a lawful reason to restrict recording, such as a valid privacy or security concern, public officials cannot typically demand that an auditor stop recording in public.


Q. How do libel and slander laws affect what First Amendment auditors can publish?

A: Auditors, like all members of the press, must avoid publishing false statements that could be defamatory and harm someone's reputation.


Q. Can a First Amendment auditor's footage be subpoenaed?

A: Yes, if the footage is relevant to a legal proceeding, it may be subpoenaed by the court.


Q. What legal protections do First Amendment auditors have when confronted by law enforcement?

A: Auditors have the right to record law enforcement in public spaces, but they must not interfere with law enforcement duties and should comply with lawful orders.


Q: Are there any federal laws that protect my rights to freedom of speech and freedom of press?

A: Yes, Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 criminalizes the willful deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities protected by the Constitution by anyone acting under color of law. It is aimed at preventing misconduct by government officials, including law enforcement, and allows for the punishment of such officials if they intentionally violate a person's civil rights.


Disclaimer: The information provided in these FAQs is for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For legal advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a licensed attorney.

bottom of page