top of page
< Back

Hurst Texas PD *ASSAULT INNOCENT WOMAN*, Now The City Is Attempting To COVER IT UP.

Rich Text lesson:

In the video "45 Pct visit !! #copwatch #police" by Good Guy Activism, the creator visits the 45th Precinct to request three Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB) complaint forms. Upon entering, he is greeted by an officer who initially directs him to find the forms online. However, the creator insists on obtaining physical forms, explaining his preference for filling them out manually and mailing them in. During this interaction, he is recording, which leads to a discussion about the legality of recording inside the precinct. The officer questions why he is recording, and the creator responds by emphasizing his right to record in public spaces. The conversation evolves into a debate about the precinct's policy against recording inside the building.

The creator argues that this policy conflicts with the "Right to Record Act," a law he claims allows public recording, including in precinct lobbies. He mentions a recent legal battle where a federal judge ruled in favor of this right, but the precinct has appealed the decision. The creator asserts that policies should not override laws, especially when it comes to public access and transparency. He also challenges the notion that recording in the precinct could compromise victim privacy, pointing out that there are no victims present and that police body cameras are also a form of public recording.

The video concludes with the creator receiving the complaint forms and having a more amicable conversation with the officers. He discusses his activism and the importance of transparency and accountability in law enforcement. The creator emphasizes the need for embracing transparency in the age of smartphones and public recording. He leaves the precinct after a cordial exchange with the officers, highlighting the importance of peaceful dialogue and understanding in such interactions. The video showcases the complexities of public recording laws and the ongoing debate over privacy and transparency in law enforcement settings.

bottom of page